This thesis involves discovering how the actors who participated in this event, and the historians who interpreted its outcome from the nineteenth century to present-day remembered the War of 1812's Battle of Niagara Falls, or, the Battle of Lundy's Lane. The goal is to show that competing militaristic narratives, which proposed victory for their respective sides, chronicled the consequences of that fray. By examining the Battle of Niagara Falls through a fresh perspective, it becomes clear that it was a stalemate. Through showing that this armed conflict lives on in parallel nationalistic memories, this thesis highlights the importance of the intersection of these accounts, which offers an alternative to these recollections.